Can you see a pattern forming here?Īnd lastly, people often refer to Michael settling out of court with another accuser back in 1993. The store settled out of court to the tune of several thousand dollars. She then took the store to court claiming the guards had sexually manhandled her (groped her in other words). Here's another reason I think he's innocent: The mother of the boy was caught shoplifting from a store and caught by two security guards a few years ago. If you can remember back to when that programme aired MJ got a lot of negative press, well the boy say's the abuse happened after that show aired so how arogant must MJ be to think that in the middle of all that comotion he could abuse a boy and get away with it? I don't think so some how. The boy alledging the abuse appeared in Martin Bashir's documentary "Living With Michael Jackson". I've been following this case very closely over the internet and here's a few things to think about: The disgraced pop star, 78, was escorted back to jail from his secluded bail hostel after. There is no evidence to say that michael jackson is guilty.there will always be doubt even if he is convicted.whereas with glitter there was 100% proof that he was doing what he was reported to be doing.so i doubt michael jackson will ever have his music blacklisted. Glam rock paedophile Gary Glitter was tonight recalled to prison - just 38 days after he was released.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |